Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

URD MAF PLUG-N-PLAY Tuning

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • URD MAF PLUG-N-PLAY Tuning

    Ok I have a late 2006 (2007 update) V6 Grande auto.

    Pretty std, K+N filter , 265-70-17 tyres , sovereign roo bar , slight lift.

    On all of my motorbikes and cars I have always tried to incrementally improve them, research, trial, etc.

    Since it is just me tinkering no dyno etc and pretty much a standard car I was looking for a easy to tune/plug and play system, Unichip would of been my first choice except price, and really just wanted to improve mileage and drivability not ultimate performance, at first ;-) and if I change exhaust system at a later date would like to adjust for that.

    Driving my Prado it was always smooth, and while punchy it felt over fuelled, and when I put the larger tyres on, which corrected my speedo error to spot on, you could feel a little bit of the surge taken away.

    So I found a device from the USA that while used with the supercharged installation where it adjusts "fuelling" and timing is Load/RPM they also make just a "fuelling" plug and play version, I purchased it got it sent over.

    While I was waiting for it to arrive I was monitoring the fuel trim levels through a "Wifi ELM327 OBD II Car OBD2 Code Scanner Diagnostic Support Android IOS" brought on eBay through an app called EOBD-Facile, so I was familiar with most levels of load, ignition advance, Oxygen sensor voltage, MAF levels.

    When it arrived it was a simple plug and play, my Windows 10 laptop connected to it via serial to USB cable and through the tuning software (similar to Power Commander tuning) and over three days of intentionally varyied driving conditions by my very patient wife I trimmed the map to where the instructions that came with stated was ideal settings.
    I tuned basically from idle to @4500 rpm in a variety of loads/speed/gears to about 60% throttle as after this point it it goes into the mode where you require a dyno.

    You can watch where the mapping is live on PC, and by watching the levels through the EOBD app you trim slowly by trail and error the MAF levels to where the fuel trims are zeroed. This would be dangerous to do with only one person driving/tuning.

    I have detailed records of my mileage over 6 months with fuel usage being actual kms travelled and litres used not the read out on the dash which is mostly there for entertainment purposes ;-) so will post mileage changes when I have a few tanks completed.

    Since I did not drive the car for these 3 days while tuning and a few days after when I finally got into the car I was surprised at the initial change as it felt as I almost had the smaller tyres back on, I took fuel out from pretty much everywhere so much leaner. After a week worth of stop and start,commuting driving I can definitely say there seems to be improvements, while I mostly drive for economy I will give it a good prod for fun and in a straight line there seems to be some extra urge, best I can describe as requiring less throttle for same speed.

    When I finish this tank/refill I will disconnect battery to reset ECU in Prado and monitor levels agian.

    There is no doubt more I could do with software and time but very happy with change vs $$.

    Here is the website
    http://urdusa.com/store/Electronics-...duct_info.html

    Will post more at a later date.
    Hobes
    Junior Member
    Last edited by Hobes; 28-04-2017, 09:15 PM.

  • #2
    Hi Hobes,

    Great post, I have installed a new custom intake on my FJ Cruiser, the MAF is now reading lower than before but is triggering Lean error codes so I believe more air is passing the MAF sensor than is being measured. The long and short trim are high and tripping the error code. I contacted URD and they said they could send me a blank map and I could tune it to sort out the trim issues. How easy is it to tune ? What factors does the software allow you tune ? Do you recommend it ? Any advice would be appreciated.

    Cheers

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi. The Software needs to be tuned live via PC (well you monitor live and make changes with engine off), basically you change the MAF signal using a table of Manifold pressure V RPM, I have a OBD2 wifi unit so I can look at the trims live including oxygen sensor voltage etc and from there follow the instructions to "tune" the map. I have had experience doing this with motorcycles and I guess in an afternoon with someone else helping you you could write a map.
      Q1. Tuning easy with two people correct equipment (Laptop,OBD2 smartphone App,time patience ).
      Q2. MAF signal using a table of Manifold pressure V RPM.
      Q3. Yes I would recommend for reasons I have explained above.
      Q4. Read OBD2 outputs via smartphone app of your choice and get an idea what is going on, but sounds like just what you need to tweak your intake changes.
      I was a little annoyed as URD said they include maps but they are for the USA petrol etc, but in the end the blank map is a start and each installation is subtly different.
      Stephen.

      Comment


      • #4
        Hi Stephen,

        Thanks for the info, the postage is a killer, how long did it take to arrive ? I'm also using a OBII wifi dongle/ Torque Pro App to log and track the MAF issue and fuel trim errors. I think I'll try and give it a go and see how it goes.

        Cheers,
        Stew

        Comment


        • #5
          Hi Stew.
          Yeah I have outlaws from USA, wife gets a care package every few months I just timed it for that. Gadget at URD seems very on the ball.(postage from USA side a killer to oz as well not just Australia post that has outrageous prices).
          Stephen.

          Comment


          • #6
            Bit of an update.
            After several tuning runs and keeping an eye on the fuel trims while I drive thru the torque app,to make sure all is ok, I have made a slight change to my fuel use.
            Pretty dismal improvement of 0.4 litres per hundred, going from 15.9l to 15.5l per 100 kms on city commute.
            Unfortunately during the last few months my wife had three car accidents with her car (none her fault :-0 ) and she was using the Prado for her commute while I rode one of my bikes, she is politely a lead foot, so hopefully over the next few tanks get some normal usage to really compare against.
            But to drive the doughiness of the engine has gone and it now quite responsive, really quite responsive from just off idle right thru rev range.
            Some things if have noted is the comical difference between the car fuel usage estimate to the real fuel use can be anywhere from 0.3 to over 3.2 litres under reading, with my new tyres my actual speed/distance travelled is exactly the same as GPS on level ground.
            Will update agian in a few months with hopefully more info.

            Comment


            • #7
              Update 2.
              Well a few more months of running the URD here are some results.
              Now to clarify as above I run 265-70-17 tyres which actually corrects speedo readings (verified on two gps's on level ground), I recorded the car fuel estimate (grande) however it is so variable I will not dignify with reporting results of this.
              I have replaced the ATF fluid with new fluid/filters but do not believe it would of made much of a difference.
              So for real distance travelling around town "commuting" before URD I was averaging 15.89 l/100 kms.
              With the URD I am averaging over the same "commuting" 14.83 l/100 kms.
              Wife driving similar route with URD fitted 15.46 l/100 kms. (yeah lead foot).
              I would of liked to compare some highway running but the only highway running I do includes 4WDing which skews results.
              Commuting for me is my trip to work and back in Perth, I work near the city but start early and there fore finish earlier so miss most of the gridlock traffic.
              I am posting this as will be shifting soon and my "commuting" will be a different route etc some could not compare these results fairly.
              I was quite surprised by the difference, but in reality the extra 100kms a fill is nice while no economy car I can quite easily live with it compared to my old Jag which averaged 16.5l/100 kms on the same route (not the reason I sold it).


              Comment

              canli bahis siteleri bahis siteleri ecebet.net
              mencisport.com
              antalya escort
              tsyd.org deneme bonusu veren siteler
              deneme bonusu veren siteler
              gaziantep escort
              gaziantep escort
              asyabahis maltcasino olabahis olabahis
              erotik film izle Rus escort gaziantep rus escort
              atasehir escort tuzla escort
              sikis sex hatti
              en iyi casino siteleri
              deneme bonusu veren siteler
              casibom
              deneme bonusu veren siteler
              deneme bonusu veren siteler
              betticket istanbulbahis
              Working...
              X