Hi all, has been a while since my last visit here.
About 6 weeks ago my wife came to grief at an intersection, running up the back of another car. That experience was bad enough (thankfully she was ok and the kids weren't with her)...but her confidence was shattered and the Prado sustained about $12k worth of damage to the front end.
After having the car sit at the repairers for three weeks without being touched because someone there forgot to submit the correct paperwork to the insurer, we finally got he car back last week.
Now I have always been paranoid about getting a car back with a bad repair and I am generally pretty particular with my cars, so with every smash-repairer experience I have had, I go over the car with a fine-toothed comb before accepting it. I have to say there has never been a time when I have been completely satisfied.
This time, the car was being detailed when we turned up to pick it up so we sat around for an hour waiting. Then, the car came was driven out of the main shed and parked next to us, idling. It sounded rough, kicked and coughed and then just stopped. The guy delivering the car to us took no notice, but it was blatantly obvious something was wrong. I tried to start it, nothing. Not even a click.
On advising the guy, he looked dismayed, walked off and got a jump-starting device....on his return, he said "we have had this on charge all night", The car started, idled roughly and stopped again. They guy removed the battery, cleaned the terminals, no joy. Off to get a new battery for us, which was good.
With the new battery in place, the car started perfectly and idled properly. All good. They left us with the car.
While the bonnet was opened dealing with the battery, I noticed the spray marks where they had repaired each guard and the repair had gone into the firewall area. It looked really rough as you could imagine because a 5 year old car firewall is pretty dirty and the repair, of course, looks brand new. Anyone looking under the bonnet will instantly see the car has been repaired. There was also over-spray on the grommets in the firewall. Just a rough job, in my opinion. They could have at least cleaned down the firewall before doing the repairs, seeing the engine was out.
Other issues included a missing cover plug from the assist handle on the passenger side front, passenger side front window not working from the driver's door control and two other unrelated minor repairs to the duco not being done as requested while in there. I have also noticed they have re-used the fog lights that were scratched in the accident. Annoying.
But the main annoyance is the paint match.
I thought it was perfect looking at the front guard to front door match, until I realised they had sprayed the driver's door, too. The passenger side of the car match seems ok, but the driver's side is a different story. The difference between the driver's door and the passenger door is not huge, but enough to see there has been a repair. The original white has a "pinkish" look to it and the new paint is really WHITE. Now I am no paint technician, but can't they still "blow" some paint into the next panel to reduce the effect? Cutting off at a straight line is always dangerous, in my mind.
Anyway, I pointed it out and they all ran around looking miffed as if there was something wrong with me and saying "but if you look at the rest of the car, all the panels are different" and "it must be the light" and "maybe the old paint needs a buff", well, ok, that might be the case, but it doesn't change the fact that the driver's door and the passenger's door it adjoins are different whites.
I have never enjoyed the event of having a car repaired for these reasons. As if the prang isn't bad enough in the first place. I just thought techniques and technology wouldn't allow this kind of thing to happen these days.
Not sure if I can be bothered taking it back yet.
DS
About 6 weeks ago my wife came to grief at an intersection, running up the back of another car. That experience was bad enough (thankfully she was ok and the kids weren't with her)...but her confidence was shattered and the Prado sustained about $12k worth of damage to the front end.
After having the car sit at the repairers for three weeks without being touched because someone there forgot to submit the correct paperwork to the insurer, we finally got he car back last week.
Now I have always been paranoid about getting a car back with a bad repair and I am generally pretty particular with my cars, so with every smash-repairer experience I have had, I go over the car with a fine-toothed comb before accepting it. I have to say there has never been a time when I have been completely satisfied.
This time, the car was being detailed when we turned up to pick it up so we sat around for an hour waiting. Then, the car came was driven out of the main shed and parked next to us, idling. It sounded rough, kicked and coughed and then just stopped. The guy delivering the car to us took no notice, but it was blatantly obvious something was wrong. I tried to start it, nothing. Not even a click.
On advising the guy, he looked dismayed, walked off and got a jump-starting device....on his return, he said "we have had this on charge all night", The car started, idled roughly and stopped again. They guy removed the battery, cleaned the terminals, no joy. Off to get a new battery for us, which was good.
With the new battery in place, the car started perfectly and idled properly. All good. They left us with the car.
While the bonnet was opened dealing with the battery, I noticed the spray marks where they had repaired each guard and the repair had gone into the firewall area. It looked really rough as you could imagine because a 5 year old car firewall is pretty dirty and the repair, of course, looks brand new. Anyone looking under the bonnet will instantly see the car has been repaired. There was also over-spray on the grommets in the firewall. Just a rough job, in my opinion. They could have at least cleaned down the firewall before doing the repairs, seeing the engine was out.
Other issues included a missing cover plug from the assist handle on the passenger side front, passenger side front window not working from the driver's door control and two other unrelated minor repairs to the duco not being done as requested while in there. I have also noticed they have re-used the fog lights that were scratched in the accident. Annoying.
But the main annoyance is the paint match.
I thought it was perfect looking at the front guard to front door match, until I realised they had sprayed the driver's door, too. The passenger side of the car match seems ok, but the driver's side is a different story. The difference between the driver's door and the passenger door is not huge, but enough to see there has been a repair. The original white has a "pinkish" look to it and the new paint is really WHITE. Now I am no paint technician, but can't they still "blow" some paint into the next panel to reduce the effect? Cutting off at a straight line is always dangerous, in my mind.
Anyway, I pointed it out and they all ran around looking miffed as if there was something wrong with me and saying "but if you look at the rest of the car, all the panels are different" and "it must be the light" and "maybe the old paint needs a buff", well, ok, that might be the case, but it doesn't change the fact that the driver's door and the passenger's door it adjoins are different whites.
I have never enjoyed the event of having a car repaired for these reasons. As if the prang isn't bad enough in the first place. I just thought techniques and technology wouldn't allow this kind of thing to happen these days.
Not sure if I can be bothered taking it back yet.
DS
Comment