Re: roadworks speed limit
I accept some of what you say DarrenC, but I also know that sometimes they are meant to cover over the signs when the requirement for a reduced speed limit is not needed. Too often, the real reason for not doing this is sheer laziness on the contractors' part. When some of these roadwork areas cover cover extended lengths of roadway at what would have been 80kph or higher speed limits (especially in more remote areas), it is extremely frustrating to see speed limit and advisory signs (ie reduced speed and roadworks ahead) only to discover that there was no need for them at the time (ie no workmen and no roadworks being conducted). In effect, this creates a situation where drivers are less likely to ever adhere to these signs if they are not properly applied... which makes for a more an even more dangerous situation next time around! Better to only apply signs when needed and remove them (or cover them) when not needed. Otherwise people become desensitised to their importance and ignore them entirely.
It should also be remembered that speed limits are only maximum limits, and drivers are still required to drive to road conditions, weather, vehicle and their own limits. Therefore, even if there were roadworks nearby to a 80kph zone, a sensible driver should still reduce their speed to make provision for the increased dangers and uncertainty of the environment. If a driver were to be involved in an accident in such a situation, and it could be proven that they did not slow down, it could be argued that they nonetheless drove at a 'dangerous speed' despite driving within the speed limit.
I'll put the soapbox away and leave my 2c on the fridge now.
I accept some of what you say DarrenC, but I also know that sometimes they are meant to cover over the signs when the requirement for a reduced speed limit is not needed. Too often, the real reason for not doing this is sheer laziness on the contractors' part. When some of these roadwork areas cover cover extended lengths of roadway at what would have been 80kph or higher speed limits (especially in more remote areas), it is extremely frustrating to see speed limit and advisory signs (ie reduced speed and roadworks ahead) only to discover that there was no need for them at the time (ie no workmen and no roadworks being conducted). In effect, this creates a situation where drivers are less likely to ever adhere to these signs if they are not properly applied... which makes for a more an even more dangerous situation next time around! Better to only apply signs when needed and remove them (or cover them) when not needed. Otherwise people become desensitised to their importance and ignore them entirely.
It should also be remembered that speed limits are only maximum limits, and drivers are still required to drive to road conditions, weather, vehicle and their own limits. Therefore, even if there were roadworks nearby to a 80kph zone, a sensible driver should still reduce their speed to make provision for the increased dangers and uncertainty of the environment. If a driver were to be involved in an accident in such a situation, and it could be proven that they did not slow down, it could be argued that they nonetheless drove at a 'dangerous speed' despite driving within the speed limit.
I'll put the soapbox away and leave my 2c on the fridge now.
photoprado
Comment