Re: Front Break Pads gone at 45,000 KM !!
hi Guys
[quoteBrake pads are cheaper to replace than a worn out drive train, from using engine braking (personal opinion) ][/quote]
I don't doubt that this is true, and in normal driving the brakes are fine most of the time but for extended down hill or steep conditions using the box is a must be it auto or manual. this is not a cost argument but a safety argument. coming from a background driving trucks if you ride the brakes they get hot and then fade and eventually fail. safe driving is cheap driving. also despite using the box for braking all of my life i have never had any problems with any gearbox ever, nor do i know anyone who has blown a gear box. i must admit in my teenage years though i might have had to replace a clutch or twelve but i think that was caused by something other than slowing down
just one last thought on the cost, i traded my last prado at 77k with 40% left on front pads and never touched the auto so maby using the box is in fact cheaper :?:
hi Guys
[quoteBrake pads are cheaper to replace than a worn out drive train, from using engine braking (personal opinion) ][/quote]
I agree My father was in the army and they did a test- brakes or gears.
Brakes was the most economical option.
Brakes was the most economical option.
just one last thought on the cost, i traded my last prado at 77k with 40% left on front pads and never touched the auto so maby using the box is in fact cheaper :?:
Comment