Gday Piggy
Given that Robert/Chipit or what ever he was/is and now is no longer a paid retailer and that most of the factual threads that revealed his true nature have been removed and i am personally very aware and very conscious of what i have written from a legal point of view when challenging his theory's the same as he was with his!
Without going into a tail-chasing debate which is now clearly a closed topic for which i do truly respect and will abide by!....
What is irritating for me is that given that he is now clearly not affiliated with this forum as a paid member is the fact that a thread that i put "ALLOT" of research/time (Same as other members of this forum) into concerning how the EGR/Turbo/fuel system very are closely related and how when emissions/ engine mechanics are tampered with how it violates warranties and road legality's for which he did not/was not able to debunk but still managed to saturate that thread with links directly to his web sight promoting his products/ His logo/ his business??
That thread "Blocking EGR" gets an average of 100 hits a week via Google (Last post was 16-09-2013 and back then had 23,489 hits!... It now has to date 61,760 hits) and i assume that traffic going to that thread is going to his website via that thread!... Not bad for a none paying member for traffic flow don't you think!
Would it be fair to say that his logo and hyper links should be removed????
Didn't want to discuss via PM as i think this particular one should be aired for closure!
Cheers
Originally posted by Piggy
View Post
Without going into a tail-chasing debate which is now clearly a closed topic for which i do truly respect and will abide by!....
What is irritating for me is that given that he is now clearly not affiliated with this forum as a paid member is the fact that a thread that i put "ALLOT" of research/time (Same as other members of this forum) into concerning how the EGR/Turbo/fuel system very are closely related and how when emissions/ engine mechanics are tampered with how it violates warranties and road legality's for which he did not/was not able to debunk but still managed to saturate that thread with links directly to his web sight promoting his products/ His logo/ his business??
That thread "Blocking EGR" gets an average of 100 hits a week via Google (Last post was 16-09-2013 and back then had 23,489 hits!... It now has to date 61,760 hits) and i assume that traffic going to that thread is going to his website via that thread!... Not bad for a none paying member for traffic flow don't you think!
Would it be fair to say that his logo and hyper links should be removed????
Didn't want to discuss via PM as i think this particular one should be aired for closure!
Cheers
Comment