50mm Ironman suspension lift with 255/85/16's
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Flex your muscles...
Collapse
X
-
Thanks guys!
Jason, I gave up on the garage long ago I'd love to turn my tiny single garage into a double, with higher than standard ceiling... half for the 4be and the other half my working (living) area
Originally posted by sae70 View Post50mm Ironman suspension lift with 255/85/16'sglen_ep - engineered, 4" lift, 33" 255/85R16, lockers, 4.88 ratios www.pradopoint.com.au/showthread.php?17237 www.youtube.com/user/glenep www.fb.com/groups/ToyotaPrado90
Comment
-
Originally posted by glen_ep View PostGreat to see another rig with 255's! And the BFG KM2's as well I really wish there were more tyre brand/models to choose from. Next time I need new tyres I might try these: Interco's TrXus 255/85R16. I've read some good reports but not sure if they're available. Alternatively Jungle Trekkers might be an option.. lol98 Prado90 TD GX called Fiery, IM suspension, 255/85/16 KM2's, Snorkel, sliders & winch (now sold & living in Switzerland)
02 Prado95 D4D GX called Swampy, IM & 80 series suspension, 285/75/16 KM2's, ARB front locker, sliders, Asfir protection & winch
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Nema View PostI have had to do some modifications to the sub tank protector the other day cause I have been finding that my tail shaft keeps touching it. Does anyone else have this issue?
I haven't had any issue with it, I did notice that my handbrake cable is tight on full flex and is something I am looking at modifying. I also put loger swaybar links on the rear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nema View PostI have had to do some modifications to the sub tank protector the other day cause I have been finding that my tail shaft keeps touching it. Does anyone else have this issue?
I think an adjustable Panhard rod would fix this too.
Cheers, Ben.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nema View PostI have had to do some modifications to the sub tank protector the other day cause I have been finding that my tail shaft keeps touching it. Does anyone else have this issue?
http://www.lcool.org/technical/90_se...t_fouling.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nema View PostI have had to do some modifications to the sub tank protector the other day cause I have been finding that my tail shaft keeps touching it. Does anyone else have this issue?
I had the same problem on my 90 when I had a 2" OME lift. The problem ended up being mounting brackets on the subtank bash plate. Once I removed the bash plate and tweaked the brackets, there was no more contact between it and the propshaft.
Here's the thread I started some time back: http://www.pradopoint.com/showthread...p-shaft-damage[B]Declan[/B]: [SIZE=1]1997 GXL 4.5 Auto 80 series on [B][COLOR="#FF0000"]LPG[/COLOR][/B], ARB bullbar, 2" OME lift, 32" MTZ, GME UHF, rear ARB locker, Kaymar spare wheel carrier[/SIZE]
[B]PLANNED[/B]: [SIZE=1]3 or 4" suspension lift, 2" body lift (maybe), winch, 35" MTZ + roadies, front locker, sliders, cylinder head rebuilt for [B][COLOR="#FF0000"]LPG[/COLOR][/B], Garret [COLOR="#4499ff"][B]Turbocharger[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nema View PostI have had to do some modifications to the sub tank protector the other day cause I have been finding that my tail shaft keeps touching it. Does anyone else have this issue?
Originally posted by Torrie 72 View PostG'day Nema. Yep it is an issue on lifted 90's on full flex. There is a thread on it somewhere. You may also find the grease nipple at the rear uni gets damaged or completely knocked off. I removed mine after busting it off and replaced it with a bolt. I re install the nipple for greasing at services only. I also cut out a small section on the side of the tank bash plate.
I think an adjustable Panhard rod would fix this too.
Cheers, Ben.
On a recent trip another PPer mentioned the panhard rod as a possible solution. An extended panhard rod had solved it on his SURF because the lift moved the axle closer to driver side, which is where his tank was. On our Prado the tank is on the passenger side, yet the panhard locations are exactly the same between the vehicles. So extending the panhard rod may very well make the issue worse.glen_ep - engineered, 4" lift, 33" 255/85R16, lockers, 4.88 ratios www.pradopoint.com.au/showthread.php?17237 www.youtube.com/user/glenep www.fb.com/groups/ToyotaPrado90
Comment
-
Originally posted by croozza View PostIf you go front locker only, you will break stuff, as it is putting too much stress on the front diff and CV's.
If you go for lockers, either go rear only or both front/rear.Originally posted by glen_ep View PostIt's potentially more strain on the CV's, but it's much better than no locker.Originally posted by croozza View PostTotally agree with you, one locker is better than no locker, but 2 lockers is better than one...lol
A front does provide more total traction per dollar, but a rear is much more practical and reliable. On the rare occasions I use lockers, the rear almost always does the job, and does it both strong and safe. The only times I'll engage the front is for very large rock steps - and on those occasions, the risk of CV failure is high.glen_ep - engineered, 4" lift, 33" 255/85R16, lockers, 4.88 ratios www.pradopoint.com.au/showthread.php?17237 www.youtube.com/user/glenep www.fb.com/groups/ToyotaPrado90
Comment
Comment