Originally posted by LeighW
View Post
However in boats, banks of batteries are normal. They normally replace all the batteries at one time though.
But another point - in boats, they will use purely deep cycle batteries. For the motor start in most boats, the starting battery will be separate to the general power for the boat. I think that is because the starter battery is normally close to the motor, and since battery banks are heavy, they put them elsewhere (low and in the centre of the boat is preferred).
The interesting thing is that deep cycle batteries have thicker lead, hence they are more reliable and have longer life. When you want to have cranking power as well, then you have to have some plates which are thinner, because they will allow the reaction to be quicker hence are able to push out high cranking amps. But that technology is not as long life and thereby as reliable.
So I would argue that more cells of deep cycle are more reliable then less cells in a dual function battery (start and deep cycle). I have a couple of gold buggy batteries which are gel batteries. They are quite small and have lots of amps. The are made in Germany. I think they are very reliable. The problem with gel though - I think - is that they requires high voltage and also require careful switching of the power when they reach their charge.
On another aspect of charging and reliability etc, I do not know too about the actual build of an Optima ... it seems that their circular construction allows a lower charge voltage, and I am guessing that their cranking ability (dual function) is due to their thinner lead wound on the outer part of their circular wind of lead and fibreglass. That Optima doesn't make a purely deep cycle also points to me that their design has had them build starting and also dual function batteries (start and deep cycle) as suiting their circular wind characteristics. Incidentally I read in a boating battery review, that the Optimas were tolerant of lower voltages for charging, hence perhaps avoiding your voltage increasing fuse (although your fuse seems cheap enough to put one in anyway).
I think therefor that it makes more sense to have a purely deep cycle in the back if one is seeking reliability. The downsides of that though are getting the cable to it, and whether to go for complex electronic devices that may also handle trailer batteries, or just go for a solenoid switch.
The advantage for me of more than one auxiliary battery, is purely because it could be put into narrower places and better suit the room in the restricted space of a 4WD. Such as a few good quality thin deep cycle batteries from the golf buggy market.
The normal thing to do though is put a single battery in the back somewhere ... and because such batteries are so common, its much easier to work that out. I am still considering all the alternatives though. The more I puzzle, the easier buying a camper trailer seems!!
An interesting point too - is lead prices. Evidently the recent price is $Au2.3/kg for lead. So if a battery weighs 30kg and it has 26kg for lead, that means its raw material cost for the lead would be $60 alone - plus the lead used is an alloy which increases its cost. I give my batteries away too ... you'd think they'd be worth something with all that lead in them!!
Incidentally, does anyone know which type of electronic device can link both batteries together for crank starting, if the starting battery is running low on power?
Leave a comment: